Presumably the research advisor has provided good advice that has helped the project along in some way—and it’s good scholarly practice to recognize this formally and visibly, with at least some brief detail as appropriate.
The acknowledgments section of a journal article, thesis, or book is the place where you thank the people and institutions that supported your research in some important way. The most obvious kind of acknowledgment is for financial support of the research and many journals have a specific acknowledgments section for recognition of the funding agency or program. But there are a great many reasons why people and/or organizations may be thanked for support other than funding. These will vary depending on the research field. In the life sciences (which I’ve studied for many years), acknowledgment categories include:
Category 1: Access to research-related information and other resources
Category 2: Access to unpublished results as stated in the acknowledgments text
Research advisors’ contributions may fall into several of these categories, depending on the nature of the support but the most common, in my experience, is Category 3, where he or she would be thanked for specific or general advice and discussion (pertaining to the research) and/or reviewing the manuscript.
Answers & Comments
Answer:
Presumably the research advisor has provided good advice that has helped the project along in some way—and it’s good scholarly practice to recognize this formally and visibly, with at least some brief detail as appropriate.
The acknowledgments section of a journal article, thesis, or book is the place where you thank the people and institutions that supported your research in some important way. The most obvious kind of acknowledgment is for financial support of the research and many journals have a specific acknowledgments section for recognition of the funding agency or program. But there are a great many reasons why people and/or organizations may be thanked for support other than funding. These will vary depending on the research field. In the life sciences (which I’ve studied for many years), acknowledgment categories include:
Category 1: Access to research-related information and other resources
Category 2: Access to unpublished results as stated in the acknowledgments text
Category 3: Peer interactive communication
Category 4: Technical assistance in research
Category 5: Manuscript preparation (post-analysis assistance)
Category 6: General administrative support
Research advisors’ contributions may fall into several of these categories, depending on the nature of the support but the most common, in my experience, is Category 3, where he or she would be thanked for specific or general advice and discussion (pertaining to the research) and/or reviewing the manuscript.
Answer:
Presumably the research advisor has provided good
advice that has helped the project along in some way. It's good scholarty practice to recognize this formally and visibly, with atleast some brief details as appropriate.
Explanation:
HOPE IT HELPS YOU!
#CARRY_ON_LEARNING