Political party-change had been a disease of Indian politics for a long time and since 1967.
This is imposing an anti-defection law was being raised.
Finally, after the elections to the eighth Lok Sabha in 1985.
Both the houses of parliament unanimously passed the 52nd Amendment Bill to impose a legal ban on political party-change.
It was inserted in the tenth schedule of the constitution.
Provisions of the Anti-Defection Law
The law contained various constitutional provisions and was criticized on various grounds.
The amended Articles 101, 102, 190 and 191 of the anti-defection law of the Constitution deal with some provisions of leave and disqualification from seats on the basis of party changes in Parliament and State Legislatures.
Anti-defection law has been added to the Tenth Schedule to the Indian Constitution which was passed in the year 1985 through the 52nd amendment of the Constitution.
The anti-defection law in India, technically the Tenth Schedule to the Indian Constitution, was enacted to address the perceived problem of instability caused by democratically elected legislators in India's federal system of government shifting allegiance from the parties they supported at the time of election, or disobeying their parties' decisions at critical times such as during voting on an important resolution. Such shifting of allegiance was considered to be a symptom of endemic political corruption, which in turn provided some legitimisation for corruption prevalent in other aspects of life in the country.
Answers & Comments
Provisions of the Anti-Defection Law
The law contained various constitutional provisions and was criticized on various grounds.
Explanation:
The anti-defection law in India, technically the Tenth Schedule to the Indian Constitution, was enacted to address the perceived problem of instability caused by democratically elected legislators in India's federal system of government shifting allegiance from the parties they supported at the time of election, or disobeying their parties' decisions at critical times such as during voting on an important resolution. Such shifting of allegiance was considered to be a symptom of endemic political corruption, which in turn provided some legitimisation for corruption prevalent in other aspects of life in the country.
HOPE IT WILL HELP YOU
PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST AND FOLLOW ME