What is the hardest heliocentric theory and why was its proponent condemned by the church?
Answer:
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.Hard heliocentrism means taking heliocentrism as a fact.
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.Hard heliocentrism means taking heliocentrism as a fact.Soft heliocentrism means not taking heliocentrism as a fact but as a working hypothesis.
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.Hard heliocentrism means taking heliocentrism as a fact.Soft heliocentrism means not taking heliocentrism as a fact but as a working hypothesis.Soft heliocentrism was never condemned, because it was not concerned with fact as such and therefore did not interfere.
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.Hard heliocentrism means taking heliocentrism as a fact.Soft heliocentrism means not taking heliocentrism as a fact but as a working hypothesis.Soft heliocentrism was never condemned, because it was not concerned with fact as such and therefore did not interfere.There were two proponents, Bruno was condemned for much worse things, and Galileo was not condemned, he was declared suspect and cleared himself by an abjuration.
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.Hard heliocentrism means taking heliocentrism as a fact.Soft heliocentrism means not taking heliocentrism as a fact but as a working hypothesis.Soft heliocentrism was never condemned, because it was not concerned with fact as such and therefore did not interfere.There were two proponents, Bruno was condemned for much worse things, and Galileo was not condemned, he was declared suspect and cleared himself by an abjuration.Why is hard heliocentrism condemnable?
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.Hard heliocentrism means taking heliocentrism as a fact.Soft heliocentrism means not taking heliocentrism as a fact but as a working hypothesis.Soft heliocentrism was never condemned, because it was not concerned with fact as such and therefore did not interfere.There were two proponents, Bruno was condemned for much worse things, and Galileo was not condemned, he was declared suspect and cleared himself by an abjuration.Why is hard heliocentrism condemnable?Because if IN FACT Earth rotates on its axis, this contradicts the account given in Joshua chapter 10, where Joshua tells Sun and Moon to change behaviour.
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.Hard heliocentrism means taking heliocentrism as a fact.Soft heliocentrism means not taking heliocentrism as a fact but as a working hypothesis.Soft heliocentrism was never condemned, because it was not concerned with fact as such and therefore did not interfere.There were two proponents, Bruno was condemned for much worse things, and Galileo was not condemned, he was declared suspect and cleared himself by an abjuration.Why is hard heliocentrism condemnable?Because if IN FACT Earth rotates on its axis, this contradicts the account given in Joshua chapter 10, where Joshua tells Sun and Moon to change behaviour.This was also an argument actually touched on by St Robert Bellarmine, ex-judge of Bruno, when judging, not Galileo as yet (this is 1616, not 1633), but a book of his, a book which he did condemn.
Answers & Comments
Question:
What is the hardest heliocentric theory and why was its proponent condemned by the church?
Answer:
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.Hard heliocentrism means taking heliocentrism as a fact.
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.Hard heliocentrism means taking heliocentrism as a fact.Soft heliocentrism means not taking heliocentrism as a fact but as a working hypothesis.
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.Hard heliocentrism means taking heliocentrism as a fact.Soft heliocentrism means not taking heliocentrism as a fact but as a working hypothesis.Soft heliocentrism was never condemned, because it was not concerned with fact as such and therefore did not interfere.
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.Hard heliocentrism means taking heliocentrism as a fact.Soft heliocentrism means not taking heliocentrism as a fact but as a working hypothesis.Soft heliocentrism was never condemned, because it was not concerned with fact as such and therefore did not interfere.There were two proponents, Bruno was condemned for much worse things, and Galileo was not condemned, he was declared suspect and cleared himself by an abjuration.
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.Hard heliocentrism means taking heliocentrism as a fact.Soft heliocentrism means not taking heliocentrism as a fact but as a working hypothesis.Soft heliocentrism was never condemned, because it was not concerned with fact as such and therefore did not interfere.There were two proponents, Bruno was condemned for much worse things, and Galileo was not condemned, he was declared suspect and cleared himself by an abjuration.Why is hard heliocentrism condemnable?
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.Hard heliocentrism means taking heliocentrism as a fact.Soft heliocentrism means not taking heliocentrism as a fact but as a working hypothesis.Soft heliocentrism was never condemned, because it was not concerned with fact as such and therefore did not interfere.There were two proponents, Bruno was condemned for much worse things, and Galileo was not condemned, he was declared suspect and cleared himself by an abjuration.Why is hard heliocentrism condemnable?Because if IN FACT Earth rotates on its axis, this contradicts the account given in Joshua chapter 10, where Joshua tells Sun and Moon to change behaviour.
I think you are confusing “hard heliocentrism” and “soft heliocentrism” with “harder” and “easier”.Hard heliocentrism means taking heliocentrism as a fact.Soft heliocentrism means not taking heliocentrism as a fact but as a working hypothesis.Soft heliocentrism was never condemned, because it was not concerned with fact as such and therefore did not interfere.There were two proponents, Bruno was condemned for much worse things, and Galileo was not condemned, he was declared suspect and cleared himself by an abjuration.Why is hard heliocentrism condemnable?Because if IN FACT Earth rotates on its axis, this contradicts the account given in Joshua chapter 10, where Joshua tells Sun and Moon to change behaviour.This was also an argument actually touched on by St Robert Bellarmine, ex-judge of Bruno, when judging, not Galileo as yet (this is 1616, not 1633), but a book of his, a book which he did condemn.