A compiler and an interpreter are two different types of programs used to translate code written in a programming language into machine-readable code that a computer can execute.
A compiler is a program that takes the entire source code of a program and converts it into machine code all at once. The output of the compiler is usually an executable file that can be run independently of the compiler. The advantages of a compiler include:
- Faster execution: Since the source code is compiled all at once, the compiled code is usually faster to execute than interpreted code.
- Better optimization: A compiler can perform various optimizations on the code to make it more efficient, such as removing unused code, inlining functions, and optimizing loops.
- Portability: Once a program is compiled, it can be run on any computer that has the same architecture without requiring the compiler.
The disadvantages of a compiler include:
- Longer development cycle: Since the entire code needs to be compiled before execution, it can take longer to develop and test a program.
- More complex debugging: Since the compiled code is machine code, debugging can be more complex than interpreted code, which can lead to longer development times.
- Less interactive: A compiled program is usually less interactive than an interpreted program since it cannot be changed on the fly.
An interpreter is a program that reads code one line at a time and executes it immediately. The advantages of an interpreter include:
- Interactive: Since code is executed immediately, an interpreter allows for more interactive development and debugging.
- Platform-independent: Since an interpreter reads the source code line-by-line, it can run on any platform that has an interpreter for the programming language.
- Easier to debug: Interpreted code is usually easier to debug since the line of code causing the problem can be identified more easily.
The disadvantages of an interpreter include:
- Slower execution: Since the code is interpreted line-by-line, interpreted code is usually slower to execute than compiled code.
- No optimization: Since code is executed line-by-line, there is usually less opportunity for optimization.
- Dependency on the interpreter: An interpreted program requires an interpreter to run, which can make deployment more complex.
In summary, compilers are generally faster and more optimized, while interpreters are generally more interactive and platform-independent. Choosing between a compiler and an interpreter depends on the specific needs of the project.
A compiler translates the entire source code in a single run. An interpreter translates the entire source code line by line. It consumes less time i.e., it is faster than an interpreter. It consumes much more time than the compiler i.e., it is slower than the compiler.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Answer:
Mark me as Brainlist
Explanation:
A compiler and an interpreter are two different types of programs used to translate code written in a programming language into machine-readable code that a computer can execute.
A compiler is a program that takes the entire source code of a program and converts it into machine code all at once. The output of the compiler is usually an executable file that can be run independently of the compiler. The advantages of a compiler include:
- Faster execution: Since the source code is compiled all at once, the compiled code is usually faster to execute than interpreted code.
- Better optimization: A compiler can perform various optimizations on the code to make it more efficient, such as removing unused code, inlining functions, and optimizing loops.
- Portability: Once a program is compiled, it can be run on any computer that has the same architecture without requiring the compiler.
The disadvantages of a compiler include:
- Longer development cycle: Since the entire code needs to be compiled before execution, it can take longer to develop and test a program.
- More complex debugging: Since the compiled code is machine code, debugging can be more complex than interpreted code, which can lead to longer development times.
- Less interactive: A compiled program is usually less interactive than an interpreted program since it cannot be changed on the fly.
An interpreter is a program that reads code one line at a time and executes it immediately. The advantages of an interpreter include:
- Interactive: Since code is executed immediately, an interpreter allows for more interactive development and debugging.
- Platform-independent: Since an interpreter reads the source code line-by-line, it can run on any platform that has an interpreter for the programming language.
- Easier to debug: Interpreted code is usually easier to debug since the line of code causing the problem can be identified more easily.
The disadvantages of an interpreter include:
- Slower execution: Since the code is interpreted line-by-line, interpreted code is usually slower to execute than compiled code.
- No optimization: Since code is executed line-by-line, there is usually less opportunity for optimization.
- Dependency on the interpreter: An interpreted program requires an interpreter to run, which can make deployment more complex.
In summary, compilers are generally faster and more optimized, while interpreters are generally more interactive and platform-independent. Choosing between a compiler and an interpreter depends on the specific needs of the project.
Answer:
Explanation:
A compiler translates the entire source code in a single run. An interpreter translates the entire source code line by line. It consumes less time i.e., it is faster than an interpreter. It consumes much more time than the compiler i.e., it is slower than the compiler.