an instance of a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn (whether validly or not) from two given or assumed propositions (premises), each of which shares a term with the conclusion, and shares a common or middle term not present in the conclusion (e.g., all dogs are animals; all animals have four legs; therefore all dogs have four legs ).
The argument must have exactly three terms.
Every term must be used exactly twice.
A term may be used only once in any premise.
The middle term of a syllogism must be used in an unqualified or universal sense.
Answers & Comments
Answer:
an instance of a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn (whether validly or not) from two given or assumed propositions (premises), each of which shares a term with the conclusion, and shares a common or middle term not present in the conclusion (e.g., all dogs are animals; all animals have four legs; therefore all dogs have four legs ).
The argument must have exactly three terms.
Every term must be used exactly twice.
A term may be used only once in any premise.
The middle term of a syllogism must be used in an unqualified or universal sense.
Explanation: