(i) According to the terms of this alliance, Indian rulers were not allowed to have their independent armed forces.
(ii) They were to be protected by the company.
(iii) The Indian rulers had to pay for the subsidiary forces
(iv) If the Indian rulers failed to make the payment, then part of their territory was taken away as penalty.
2 votes Thanks 1
riteshsinha1975
According to this alliance: 1. Indian rulers were not allowed to maintain their own army . They were to be protected by the Company. 2. They were not allowed to trade with other European companies. 3. They had to pay for this alliance by giving soldier for above cause. 4. If they failed to pay for this alliance a part of their territory would be annexed a penalty
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Answer:
(i) According to the terms of this alliance, Indian rulers were not allowed to have their independent armed forces.
(ii) They were to be protected by the company.
(iii) The Indian rulers had to pay for the subsidiary forces
(iv) If the Indian rulers failed to make the payment, then part of their territory was taken away as penalty.
1. Indian rulers were not allowed to maintain their own army . They were to be protected by the Company.
2. They were not allowed to trade with other European companies.
3. They had to pay for this alliance by giving soldier for above cause.
4. If they failed to pay for this alliance a part of their territory would be annexed a penalty