(THE CONTINUE OF THE STORY)
As our parents did, we try to teach our children to be truthful. Our very democracy
is dependent on a strong relationship of trust between the people and their leaders. But in
recent years, whether because of lost values or the ease and speed of modern
communications, a bad example is being set for future generations by those who tell people
the political message rather than what is really happening.
This may provide some short-term political gains, but ultimately, the nation pays a
terrible price. Huey Long decided to tell the simple truth when he said he lied in his
campaign. It might just be that telling the simple truth can work to restore both our politics
and our democracy. Long knows, it's worth a try.

Respond with your thoughts below.
1. Panetta says, "honesty... worked well for Long. Why is it so difficult to work for
many of those in public office today?"*
What kind of honesty worked well with Long? Can you consider it a form of honesty?
Why do you think public officials find it difficult to be honest?
2. Do you agree with Panetta when he says that due to the "spin game", the people have
lost trust in government and politics? Why? What evidence makes you tell this?
3. Panetta also states, "a bad message is being set for future generations by those who
tell people the political message rather than what is really happening." How do you
interpret this comment? Do you agree or disagree? Explain.
4. "This (spin]may provide some short-term political gains, but ultimately, the nation
pays a terrible price." What price do you think Panetta is implying?

Nonsense Answer (REPORT)

Good Answer (BRAINLIEST)

PLSS! YUNG MAY ALAM LANG PO SANA ANG SUMAGOT THANKS :)​