The argument below is an example of disjunctive syllogism. (ASAP ANSWER) "If it rains, you'll get wet" ; and "If it's cold, you'll shiver". "Either it's raining", or "it's cold". Therefore, you're either wet, or you're shivering.
Yes, the argument you provided is an example of disjunctive syllogism. Disjunctive syllogism is a type of logical argument in which the conclusion is drawn from two disjunctive (mutually exclusive) premises, one of which must be true. In this case, the premises are "If it rains, you'll get wet" and "If it's cold, you'll shiver", and the conclusion is "Either it's raining, or it's cold. Therefore, you're either wet, or you're shivering." The conclusion follows logically from the premises because if it is raining, you must be wet, and if it is cold, you must be shivering. Since one of these two things must be true, the conclusion must also be true.
Answers & Comments
Answer:
Yes, the argument you provided is an example of disjunctive syllogism. Disjunctive syllogism is a type of logical argument in which the conclusion is drawn from two disjunctive (mutually exclusive) premises, one of which must be true. In this case, the premises are "If it rains, you'll get wet" and "If it's cold, you'll shiver", and the conclusion is "Either it's raining, or it's cold. Therefore, you're either wet, or you're shivering." The conclusion follows logically from the premises because if it is raining, you must be wet, and if it is cold, you must be shivering. Since one of these two things must be true, the conclusion must also be true.
Answer:
you're shivering, you're wet and after that you'll get cold after you'll get cold you're shivering