Statement LM or MN <LM
Reason
Assumption that MN > LM
MN
1. Considering MN = LM.
Definition of
2. Consequently, what can you
say about L and LN?
of
isosceles triangles are congruent.
The conclusion that L = UN
the given
3. The assumption that MN =
IM is
I TRUE
FALSE
that mel>MZN.
4. Considering MN <IM:
If one side of a triangle is longer
than a second side, then the angle
opposite the first side is larger than
the angle opposite the seconf side.
The conclusion that mul < m_N
contradicts the given that
5. The assumption that MN<
LM is
OTRUE O FALSE
6. Therefore, MN > LM must be
The
that MN >
LM contradicts the known fact that
MZL > MLN.
O TRUE
[ FALSE
Reason
Assumption that MN > LM
MN
1. Considering MN = LM.
Definition of
2. Consequently, what can you
say about L and LN?
of
isosceles triangles are congruent.
The conclusion that L = UN
the given
3. The assumption that MN =
IM is
I TRUE
FALSE
that mel>MZN.
4. Considering MN <IM:
If one side of a triangle is longer
than a second side, then the angle
opposite the first side is larger than
the angle opposite the seconf side.
The conclusion that mul < m_N
contradicts the given that
5. The assumption that MN<
LM is
OTRUE O FALSE
6. Therefore, MN > LM must be
The
that MN >
LM contradicts the known fact that
MZL > MLN.
O TRUE
[ FALSE
Add an Answer
More Questions From This User See All