Explanation:
we have
−
|
y
+
x
√
(
2
1
)
≥
⇒
i
f
,
then squaring both sides
.
since
0
then L.H.S. of (1) is non positive and R.H.S of (2) is non negative. Therefore the system is satisfied only when both sides are zero.
∴
The inequality (1) is equivalent to the system
{
=
THe first equation gives x=0 or y=0. if x=0, then we find
±
from second equation but
which is impossible.
If y=0 then from second equation we find
x=1,-1
taking x=1
∵
the pair (1,0) satisfies the given inequation. Hence (1,0) is the solution of the original
inequation.
Copyright © 2024 EHUB.TIPS team's - All rights reserved.
Answers & Comments
Explanation:
we have
−
|
y
|
+
x
√
(
x
2
+
y
2
−
1
)
≥
1
⇒
x
−
|
y
|
≥
1
+
√
(
x
2
+
y
2
−
1
)
i
f
x
≥
|
y
|
,
then squaring both sides
x
2
y
2
−
2
x
|
y
|
≥
+
x
2
+
y
2
−
1
+
2
√
(
x
2
+
y
2
−
1
)
⇒
−
x
|
y
|
≥
√
(
x
2
+
y
2
−
1
)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(
1
)
since
x
≥
|
y
|
≥
0
then L.H.S. of (1) is non positive and R.H.S of (2) is non negative. Therefore the system is satisfied only when both sides are zero.
∴
The inequality (1) is equivalent to the system
{
x
|
y
|
=
0
x
2
+
y
2
−
1
=
0
THe first equation gives x=0 or y=0. if x=0, then we find
y
±
1
from second equation but
x
≥
|
y
|
which is impossible.
If y=0 then from second equation we find
x
2
=
1
∴
x=1,-1
taking x=1
(
∵
x
≥
|
y
|
)
∴
the pair (1,0) satisfies the given inequation. Hence (1,0) is the solution of the original
inequation.