Answer: I agree with the liquor ban being strictly implemented. Even before the ECQ was enforced, most LGUs already had local ordinances banning the drinking of alcohol in public places, including roads, streets, sidewalks and alleys, even in public plazas and parks. It was already illegal to do so prior to the ECQ, and violators had to be sanctioned even then.
If restrictions on the sale and consumption of liquor were based on other reasons, let’s say because alcohol intoxication leads to abusive and violent behavior at home, or it could lead to medical emergencies that could further strain hospital resources, then that’s another matter. But to penalize the majority of your constituents who are complying with the ECQ just because of a few pasaway tambays sa kalye does not seem justified.
This does not mean that LGUs cannot enforce their own rules amid the ECQ in certain circumstances, because indeed they are autonomous enough to do so. We only argue that there must be sufficient reasons for the enforcement of additional rules and sanctions, and that these must be proportional to the needs of the people, to rule out the arbitrary exercise of powers.
Answers & Comments
Answer: I agree with the liquor ban being strictly implemented. Even before the ECQ was enforced, most LGUs already had local ordinances banning the drinking of alcohol in public places, including roads, streets, sidewalks and alleys, even in public plazas and parks. It was already illegal to do so prior to the ECQ, and violators had to be sanctioned even then.
If restrictions on the sale and consumption of liquor were based on other reasons, let’s say because alcohol intoxication leads to abusive and violent behavior at home, or it could lead to medical emergencies that could further strain hospital resources, then that’s another matter. But to penalize the majority of your constituents who are complying with the ECQ just because of a few pasaway tambays sa kalye does not seem justified.
This does not mean that LGUs cannot enforce their own rules amid the ECQ in certain circumstances, because indeed they are autonomous enough to do so. We only argue that there must be sufficient reasons for the enforcement of additional rules and sanctions, and that these must be proportional to the needs of the people, to rule out the arbitrary exercise of powers.
Explanation: