John stuart mill denies that utilization sacrifices individual rights. He thinks that the principle of utility is the very foundation and basis for the justification for protecting individual rights. Was mill right? If yes or no provide newspaper cutouts to make your point.
Answers & Comments
John Stuart Mill was a utilitarian philosopher who believed that actions should be evaluated based on their usefulness or utility in promoting the overall happiness or well-being of society. He argued that the principle of utility should be the foundation for determining which actions are morally right or wrong. However, Mill also believed that individual rights and freedoms should be protected, as they contribute to the overall happiness and well-being of society.
In his work "On Liberty," Mill argued that individual rights should only be restricted when they harm others or interfere with the greater good of society. He believed that the government should only intervene in individual affairs when necessary to prevent harm to others, and that individuals should be free to pursue their own interests and desires as long as they do not harm others.
Overall, Mill believed that individual rights and the principle of utility were not in conflict, but rather complementary. He argued that protecting individual rights was essential for promoting overall happiness and well-being, and that the principle of utility should be used to guide decisions that affect society as a whole.
In conclusion, while there may be different perspectives on the relationship between individual rights and the principle of utility, Mill's views suggest that they can be reconciled and should not be seen as mutually exclusive.