Fundamental Rights Vs Duties

It is difficult to say for certain whether a constitution with only fundamental duties and no fundamental rights would be considered a good and democratic one, as this would depend on the specific duties that were defined and how they were implemented. However, in general, a constitution that does not include fundamental rights may not be considered as good and democratic as one that does.

Fundamental rights are an essential aspect of a democratic society, as they protect the individual freedoms and liberties of citizens and help to ensure that the government respects and upholds the basic rights of its people. Without fundamental rights, individuals may be vulnerable to abuses of power or discrimination by the government or other authorities.

On the other hand, while fundamental duties are important for promoting a sense of civic responsibility and promoting the common good, they do not provide the same level of protection for individual rights and freedoms. In order to be considered a good and democratic constitution, it would likely be necessary for it to include a balanced mix of both fundamental rights and duties.

So, in short, a constitution with only fundamental duties may not be considered a good and democratic one.

[tex]\sf \: \red{Hope \: It \: Helps!}[/tex]