"I must understand before I believe" and "I must believe before I understand" are two philosophical phrases that contradict each other.
On your own opinion, which of the two is more reasonable? Explain your answer.
This is a philosophical question.
(There is no right and wrong answer)
On your own opinion, which of the two is more reasonable? Explain your answer.
This is a philosophical question.
(There is no right and wrong answer)
Answers & Comments
Answer:
For me, myself the more reasonable is "I must believe before I understand". Why?
Explanation:
Because in God, you believe his miracles before you understand. And as a student you need to believe it, to understand it. That driving motivation of believing it is gonna help you to understand it.
But when you understand it before you believe it, it is also reasonable since understanding the news is important because it might be fake. Understanding one question is needed before you believe your answer is right.
Nevertheless let me ask you a question what is more reasonable, Because to believing it before understanding it, a pastor, a spiritual will agree that this is more reasonable but according to an atheist, a scientist, the skeptics. For them it is more reasonable to understand it, before you believe. It depends on the person, see.
But I, myself, my opinion. Is that it is more reasonable to believe it then understand it or rather "I must believe before I understand".
#CarryOnLearning