Answer:

For relevance,

-To determine relevance, the purpose and bias must be understood. In fact, all aspects of evaluation must be taken into consideration to determine relevance.

For adequacy,

-Adequacy evaluations are limited to describing whether or not the expected changes have taken place. When assessing provision or utilization, one may reasonably ascribe an observed success to the programme being evaluated.

For truthfulness,

-Evaluating truthfulness requires distinguishing truths from lies. A lie represents a deliberate attempt to deceive without prior notification. . Lies should not be confused with memory errors or other types of non-intentional inaccuracies, which can occur for a variety of reasons unrelated to deceit. There are different types of lies (e.g., falsification, concealment/omission, the incorrect inference dodge, telling the truth falsely) and different topics of deception (e.g., emotional, opinion, factual, intent). In contrast, a truth is an expression of an honestly held belief or the description of a memory that one believes to be the truth, irrespective of its historical accuracy (e.g., narrative vs. historical truth).

For validitity information

-Look at the author's credentials. For scholarly articles, this is usually pretty simple. ...

Review the article's contents.

Examine the evidence.

Determine bias.

Explanation: