How does the policy "No vaccine no ride", affects the live of the Filipinos in terms of linguistic, cultural, socio-economic background, and religion?
For me, the "No vaccination, no ride" policy has an impact on the lives of Filipinos in terms of linguistic, cultural, socioeconomic background, and religion. One explanation is that the policy is so anti-poor that individuals are unable to venture outside and visit a vaccination station due to factors such as comorbidity. Furthermore, the government has said that vaccination is not required, so why is this policy being implemented? This policy would disproportionately affect those of lower socioeconomic status. It also has an impact on our economic situation since individuals are confined to their houses and are unable to work.
edit:
In terms of...
1. Linguistic - People are afraid to voice out their opinions about no vaccine no ride because they are afraid to judge by society that they are anti-vaccine even though they are not and have reasons such as comorbidities.
2. Cultural - In terms of culture, Filipinos are notorious for being superstitious, and many individuals are circulating false information about vaccination's negative effects. Individual rights and public health positions toward vaccination distrust and mistrust of vaccinations across many worldwide cultures and societies give rise to several significant cultural viewpoints on vaccination.
3. Socio-economic - People in the lower classes are concerned about the side effects and how much money such illnesses will cost them. They are also concerned about their immunities, fearing that they will be unable to purchase medications or that their loved ones may die as a result of their immune system's inability to carry such a high dose of the vaccination.
4. Religion - Filipinos are well-known for their religious beliefs. Several religion and spiritual systems encourage opposing viewpoints on immunization. Religious arguments to vaccines are typically based on ethical problems associated with using human tissue cells to create vaccines, as well as religious views that the body is sacred, should not be exposed to certain chemicals, blood, or tissues from animals, and therefore should be healed by a god or by natural means.
4 votes Thanks 5
MinUn
Hi. Thanks for the help. But can you separate your answers in each category? If you mind?
Answers & Comments
For me, the "No vaccination, no ride" policy has an impact on the lives of Filipinos in terms of linguistic, cultural, socioeconomic background, and religion. One explanation is that the policy is so anti-poor that individuals are unable to venture outside and visit a vaccination station due to factors such as comorbidity. Furthermore, the government has said that vaccination is not required, so why is this policy being implemented? This policy would disproportionately affect those of lower socioeconomic status. It also has an impact on our economic situation since individuals are confined to their houses and are unable to work.
edit:
In terms of...
1. Linguistic - People are afraid to voice out their opinions about no vaccine no ride because they are afraid to judge by society that they are anti-vaccine even though they are not and have reasons such as comorbidities.
2. Cultural - In terms of culture, Filipinos are notorious for being superstitious, and many individuals are circulating false information about vaccination's negative effects. Individual rights and public health positions toward vaccination distrust and mistrust of vaccinations across many worldwide cultures and societies give rise to several significant cultural viewpoints on vaccination.
3. Socio-economic - People in the lower classes are concerned about the side effects and how much money such illnesses will cost them. They are also concerned about their immunities, fearing that they will be unable to purchase medications or that their loved ones may die as a result of their immune system's inability to carry such a high dose of the vaccination.
4. Religion - Filipinos are well-known for their religious beliefs. Several religion and spiritual systems encourage opposing viewpoints on immunization. Religious arguments to vaccines are typically based on ethical problems associated with using human tissue cells to create vaccines, as well as religious views that the body is sacred, should not be exposed to certain chemicals, blood, or tissues from animals, and therefore should be healed by a god or by natural means.