Verified answer

Answer:

The difference between the two was that: D. Truman believed in avoiding nuclear war if at all possible, while Eisenhower believed that nuclear war may be necessary to stop communism from spreading across Asia. Nuclear weapon usage by PresidentsTruman might have used the atomic bomb against Japan, but he was strongly against nuclear war. Eisenhower was also against nuclear war, but made it clear that he would use nuclear weapons if he needed to in East Asia. In conclusion, Truman wanted to avoid nuclear war after the bombings of Japan but Eisenhower threatened to use nuclear warfare to stop communism in East Asia. 

Find out more on Eisenhower at brainly.com/question/1166595.

Explanation:

pa brainliest ako pls po

I hope this helps :) =)

Both Truman and Eisenhower's actions and beliefs on containment had similarities and differences. Containment was a foreign policy strategy that aimed to prevent the spread of communism by the Soviet Union and its allies. Both presidents followed a policy of containment, but their approach to it differed in some ways.

A. Truman believed in the use of nuclear weapons as a deterrent against Soviet aggression, while Eisenhower was more hesitant to use them. Truman issued a directive in 1945, which stated that nuclear weapons were to be used only as a last resort, but he also believed that the mere threat of using them could deter the Soviet Union from taking aggressive actions. Eisenhower, on the other hand, was more cautious in his approach to nuclear weapons and sought to reduce their role in US foreign policy.

B. Truman promised aid to the Middle Eastern countries that resisted communist aggression, while Eisenhower promised military and economic aid to Turkey and Greece. Truman's policy of containment extended to the Middle East, and he provided aid to countries like Iran, Iraq, and Turkey to resist communist influence. Eisenhower's approach was more focused on Europe and he provided aid to Turkey and Greece to help them resist communist aggression.

C. Truman believed in avoiding nuclear war if at all possible, while Eisenhower believed that nuclear war may be necessary to stop communism from spreading across Asia. Truman's policy of containment was mainly focused on preventing the spread of communism, and he believed that avoiding nuclear war was essential to achieve this goal. Eisenhower, however, believed that the spread of communism in Asia was a serious threat to US security, and he was prepared to use nuclear weapons if necessary to stop it.

D. Eisenhower sent aid to Western Europe, which helped Eastern communist states, while Truman was against sending any type of aid to communist countries. Truman was against providing any form of aid to communist countries, as it would be seen as supporting their regime. Eisenhower, on the other hand, provided aid to Western European countries through the Marshall Plan, which helped rebuild the war-torn economies of Western Europe and also helped to contain the spread of communism in Eastern Europe.

In summation, while both Truman and Eisenhower followed a policy of containment, their approach to it was different. Truman was more focused on avoiding nuclear war and providing aid to countries to resist communist aggression, while Eisenhower believed in the use of nuclear weapons as a deterrent and providing aid to Turkey and Greece to help them resist communist aggression.

`It would be greatly appreciated if you could rate my answer and mark it as the brainliest one.