Answer:

I don't think same sex marriage law can eliminate gender inequality, I think martial law is higher and stricter than same sex marriage legislation

Explanation:

oqbwoqbekqbavsuwjabsjqoq

Answer:

As the legalization of same-sex marriage spreads across the states, some

religious believers refuse to serve same-sex married couples. In the academy, a

group of law and religion scholars frames these refusals as “conscientious

objection” to the act of marriage. They propose “marriage conscience protection”

that would allow public employees and private individuals or businesses to refuse

to “facilitate” same-sex marriages. They rely on the theoretical premise that

commercial actors’ objections to marriage are equivalent to doctors’ objections to

controversial medical procedures. They model their proposal on medical

conscience legislation, which allows doctors to refuse to perform abortions. Such

legislation, they say, would dispel conflicts over same-sex marriage and lead to

acceptance of gay couples’ relationships.

This Article argues that same-sex marriage objections lack the distinct and

compelling features of conscientious objection recognized by law. It offers the first

systemic critique of medicine as a construct for the same-sex marriage debates. It

demonstrates that legislative protection of conscientious objection traditionally has

been limited to life-and-death acts for which the objector has direct responsibility

and further justified in medicine by ethical commitments particular to the

profession—bases that are absent from the marriage context. By identifying the

theoretical foundation of conscientious objection protections, this Article provides

the groundwork for distinguishing between conscience claims that can be justified

and those that cannot, in medicine and beyond.

This Article further contends that the experience of medical conscience

legislation represents a cautionary tale, rather than the success story that marriage

conscience proponents claim. Conscience protection in the medical model could

actually increase conflict and entrench opposition. Ultimately, these critiques

undermine the theoretical and practical foundations of “marriage conscience

protection.” They suggest that antidiscrimination law, where we have traditionally

balanced religion and equality, constitutes a more useful lens through which to

view religious accommodation.

Explanation:

pake brainlies answer po