The third person narrator who relates the story provides so much insight into Mathilde Loisel’s thoughts, emotions and feelings that the reader gets a clear picture of her point of view. However, because the story is related by the narrator, who is removed from the action that takes place in the story and is not one of the characters in it, it might not be technically accurate to say that "The Necklace" is told from Mathilde Loisel’s point of view.
The third person narrator who relates the story provides so much insight into Mathilde Loisel’s thoughts, emotions and feelings that the reader gets a clear picture of her point of view. However, because the story is related by the narrator, who is removed from the action that takes place in the story and is not one of the characters in it, it might not be technically accurate to say that "The Necklace" is told from Mathilde Loisel’s point of view.The story, in fact, opens with a description of Mathilde that tells us right from the start something about her point of view. She was pretty and charming and believed that she should have been born to a family with a higher social status than that of her own family. Because she had no path to meet and marry a “man of wealth and distinction,” she married someone she looked down upon. The narrator communicates her feeling of superiority to her husband and his status by telling the reader that “she let herself be married” to him—as if she were completely passive in the act of entering into the marriage—and by using the word “minor” to describe his situation and career. Moreover, she was “unhappy” with her lot in life and “suffered.” She felt that she deserved and was entitled to more.
The third person narrator who relates the story provides so much insight into Mathilde Loisel’s thoughts, emotions and feelings that the reader gets a clear picture of her point of view. However, because the story is related by the narrator, who is removed from the action that takes place in the story and is not one of the characters in it, it might not be technically accurate to say that "The Necklace" is told from Mathilde Loisel’s point of view.The story, in fact, opens with a description of Mathilde that tells us right from the start something about her point of view. She was pretty and charming and believed that she should have been born to a family with a higher social status than that of her own family. Because she had no path to meet and marry a “man of wealth and distinction,” she married someone she looked down upon. The narrator communicates her feeling of superiority to her husband and his status by telling the reader that “she let herself be married” to him—as if she were completely passive in the act of entering into the marriage—and by using the word “minor” to describe his situation and career. Moreover, she was “unhappy” with her lot in life and “suffered.” She felt that she deserved and was entitled to more.As the story continues, we get further insight into her thoughts and point of view through description and through her actions. For instance, when her husband proudly brings home the invitation to the Ministry party, mistakenly believing that she will be delighted, she cries and shouts at him in anger. We get some minimal insight into his character after the necklace is lost because we know about his effort to retrace their steps to find it and the sacrifice they both make to replace it. However, it is always Mathilde's feelings that are described most vividly, which gives the reader knowledge of her point of view.
Answers & Comments
Answer:
The third person narrator who relates the story provides so much insight into Mathilde Loisel’s thoughts, emotions and feelings that the reader gets a clear picture of her point of view. However, because the story is related by the narrator, who is removed from the action that takes place in the story and is not one of the characters in it, it might not be technically accurate to say that "The Necklace" is told from Mathilde Loisel’s point of view.
The third person narrator who relates the story provides so much insight into Mathilde Loisel’s thoughts, emotions and feelings that the reader gets a clear picture of her point of view. However, because the story is related by the narrator, who is removed from the action that takes place in the story and is not one of the characters in it, it might not be technically accurate to say that "The Necklace" is told from Mathilde Loisel’s point of view.The story, in fact, opens with a description of Mathilde that tells us right from the start something about her point of view. She was pretty and charming and believed that she should have been born to a family with a higher social status than that of her own family. Because she had no path to meet and marry a “man of wealth and distinction,” she married someone she looked down upon. The narrator communicates her feeling of superiority to her husband and his status by telling the reader that “she let herself be married” to him—as if she were completely passive in the act of entering into the marriage—and by using the word “minor” to describe his situation and career. Moreover, she was “unhappy” with her lot in life and “suffered.” She felt that she deserved and was entitled to more.
The third person narrator who relates the story provides so much insight into Mathilde Loisel’s thoughts, emotions and feelings that the reader gets a clear picture of her point of view. However, because the story is related by the narrator, who is removed from the action that takes place in the story and is not one of the characters in it, it might not be technically accurate to say that "The Necklace" is told from Mathilde Loisel’s point of view.The story, in fact, opens with a description of Mathilde that tells us right from the start something about her point of view. She was pretty and charming and believed that she should have been born to a family with a higher social status than that of her own family. Because she had no path to meet and marry a “man of wealth and distinction,” she married someone she looked down upon. The narrator communicates her feeling of superiority to her husband and his status by telling the reader that “she let herself be married” to him—as if she were completely passive in the act of entering into the marriage—and by using the word “minor” to describe his situation and career. Moreover, she was “unhappy” with her lot in life and “suffered.” She felt that she deserved and was entitled to more.As the story continues, we get further insight into her thoughts and point of view through description and through her actions. For instance, when her husband proudly brings home the invitation to the Ministry party, mistakenly believing that she will be delighted, she cries and shouts at him in anger. We get some minimal insight into his character after the necklace is lost because we know about his effort to retrace their steps to find it and the sacrifice they both make to replace it. However, it is always Mathilde's feelings that are described most vividly, which gives the reader knowledge of her point of view.