According to the subsidiary alliance, the Indian rulers were not allowed to have an independent army; instead, they were to be protected by the British, but the Indian ruler had to pay for the subsidiary forces. If the ruler failed to do so, their territory was to be taken by the East India Company as a penalty.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Answer:
subsidiary alliance, in South Asian history, was a tributary alliance between an Indian state and a European East India Company.
Explanation:
hi can i have your intro
Answer:
According to the subsidiary alliance, the Indian rulers were not allowed to have an independent army; instead, they were to be protected by the British, but the Indian ruler had to pay for the subsidiary forces. If the ruler failed to do so, their territory was to be taken by the East India Company as a penalty.
I hope this helps :)