Answer:

The history of philosophy gives us many different accounts of a true self, connecting it to the essence of what a person is, the notion of conscience, and the ideal human being. Some proponents of the true self can also be found within psychology, but its existence is mostly rejected. However, many psychological studies have shown that people commonly believe in the existence of a true self. Although folk psychology often includes a belief in a true self, psychological science disputed its existence. Here, we consider the critique. stating that the true self is (1) radically subjective and (2) not observable, hence cannot be studied scientifically. Upon closer investigation, the argument that the self is radically subjective is not convincing. Furthermore, rather than accepting that the true self cannot be studied scientifically, we ask: What would science have to look like to be able to study the true self? To answer this question, we outline the conceptual nature of the true self, which involves phenomenological and narrative aspects in addition to psychological dimensions. These aspects together suggest a method through which this concept can be investigated from the first-person perspective. On a whole, we propose an integrative approach to understanding and investigating the true self.

A natural self is metaphysically dependent on the body from which its states emerge and upon which they supervene, and it survives no longer than the body does, but it does not have the same identity conditions as the body, and neither are the mental states of the self reducible to physical states of the body.

Philosophy broadens the range of things one can understand and enjoy. It can give self-knowledge, foresight, and a sense of direction in life. It can lead to self-discovery, expansion of consciousness, and self-renewal.

Philosophy deals with studying nature and life, whereas psychology deals with the study of the mind and its behavior. Although psychology is derived from philosophy itself, there are many differences present  

between them. Still, both subjects explore humankind, nature, and their interactions.

The philosophy of self is the study of the many conditions of identity that make one subject of experience distinct from other experiences. The self is sometimes understood as a unified being essentially connected to consciousness, awareness, and agency.

The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest issues in psychology. The debate centers on the relative contributions of genetic inheritance and environmental factors to human development. Genetic traits handed down from parents' influence are individual differences that make each person unique.  

Difference Between Philosophy and Psychology. Philosophy studies the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence, especially when considered an academic discipline. Psychology deals with the study of the human mind and its behavior in a given social context.

It teaches critical thinking, close reading, clear writing, and logical analysis; it uses these to understand the language we use to describe the world, and our place within it. Different areas of philosophy are distinguished by the question they asked.

Answer:

sorry Po kailangan ko points sorry sorry sorry