On its face, the scheme of pork barrels tends to be a democratic way to distribute government money. Inherited from the United States, this scheme is intended to distribute funds equally to every congressional district to be used for the most urgent needs of its citizens. And who knows better the needs of these congressional groups than the people they voted to represent them? Work of the legislature. It is true that the main duty of the legislature is to pass common good laws, not to create bridges, schools and medical clinics, or to feed orphans, award scholarships, or distribute fertilizers.But, so the idea goes, they should serve—on the side—their constituents.Better by guiding government money to the immediate needs of their neighborhoods. Over the decades, attempts have been made to deodorize the barrel of pork. In order to highlight its emphasis on rural areas, it was named the Countryside Development Fund. When this name became odorous, it was changed to the Priority Development Assistance Fund.
Lsaby
the answer is wrong. for me. it's a bit way too far from the discussion
katemaxenenuera82
Pork barrel should be abolished because it gives certain people an unfair advantage and control over our political and domestic lifestyle that those who do not have enough money can affect. It allows the rich to get the things they seem fit and the poor to have to just accept the consequences
Answers & Comments
Answer:
On its face, the scheme of pork barrels tends to be a democratic way to distribute government money. Inherited from the United States, this scheme is intended to distribute funds equally to every congressional district to be used for the most urgent needs of its citizens. And who knows better the needs of these congressional groups than the people they voted to represent them? Work of the legislature. It is true that the main duty of the legislature is to pass common good laws, not to create bridges, schools and medical clinics, or to feed orphans, award scholarships, or distribute fertilizers.But, so the idea goes, they should serve—on the side—their constituents.Better by guiding government money to the immediate needs of their neighborhoods. Over the decades, attempts have been made to deodorize the barrel of pork. In order to highlight its emphasis on rural areas, it was named the Countryside Development Fund. When this name became odorous, it was changed to the Priority Development Assistance Fund.
Explanation: