Answer:

Tips To Answer Situational Questions

Following the right strategy or method can make answering situational questions much easier. Here are some tips and methods you can use to help you answer situational interview questions:

Use the STAR method: This is a well-known method that is very helpful in formulating a structured and well-thought-out response. STAR stands for Situation, Task, Action and Result.

Deploy the Problem-solution-benefit formula: This method involves describing a problem you faced, your solution to it and how it benefited your employer.

Keep examples ready: Review your previous experience and extract some examples from your professional experience that can be useful while answering some common types of situational interview questions. This helps you answer more confidently and be sure of your skills.

Practice mirror talk: Pretend that your mirror is the interviewer and practice answering the questions in front of it. This might feel awkward at first, but when you have done this a few times, you might notice a tremendous confidence boost.

Stay relevant: While sharing details of an anecdote, it can get easy to get distracted and share irrelevant details. Remember what the interviewer really wants to know and make sure that gets highlighted in your answer.

Be authentic: If you feel you could have done better on a previous occasion but came out of it with great learning, be willing to admit it. This reflects far more confidence and the ability to learn, adapt and grow than a made-up superhero story.

Verified answer

[tex]\huge{\underline{\underline{\pmb{\mathtt{\pink{A}\red{N}\orange{S}\purple{W}\green{E}\blue{R}}}}}}[/tex]

"The Man Who Knew Too Much" is a story by Gilbert Keith Chesterton. It's important to note that Chesterton's story only has one canonical ending. However, I can certainly provide an alternative ending based on your request, while ensuring it stays consistent with the themes and characters of the story.

Original Ending Summary:

In the original ending of "The Man Who Knew Too Much," the protagonist, Horne Fisher, is faced with the realization that his close friend, Harold March, is the mastermind behind a series of heinous crimes. Despite their friendship, Horne Fisher concludes that March's twisted sense of justice and intellectual arrogance have driven him to commit these acts. In a tense confrontation, Horne Fisher chooses to reveal March's guilt to the police, leading to his arrest. The story ends on a somber note as Horne Fisher reflects on the tragic outcome of his discoveries.

Alternative Ending:

In this alternate ending, I'll explore a scenario where Horne Fisher makes a different choice, leading to a more complex resolution.

As Horne Fisher gathers evidence pointing towards Harold March's involvement in the crimes, he confronts March in a secluded place. Instead of immediately revealing the evidence to the police, Horne Fisher engages in a long and intense conversation with March. During this conversation, Fisher delves deep into the philosophical and ethical underpinnings of March's actions.

March passionately defends his actions, arguing that he was driven to expose the moral hypocrisy of society's elites through his orchestrated crimes. He believes that the world is in dire need of reform and that he is the only one who dares to challenge the prevailing norms. Horne Fisher finds himself torn between his friendship with March and his commitment to justice.

In this ending, Horne Fisher decides not to turn March over to the police immediately. Instead, he tries to reason with March, urging him to find a more constructive and ethical way to address the societal issues he has identified. The two engage in a battle of wits and ideology, exploring the complexities of justice, morality, and the greater good.

Eventually, after a series of conversations and events that challenge both characters' beliefs, March comes to a realization. He sees that his methods, while driven by a desire for justice, have caused irreparable harm and suffering. Overwhelmed by guilt and remorse, March decides to surrender himself to the authorities, acknowledging the need for accountability.

The story ends on a more nuanced note, with Horne Fisher reflecting on the complexity of human nature and the blurred lines between right and wrong. The resolution highlights the power of dialogue, empathy, and the potential for redemption even in the face of dark deeds.

Reasoning for the Alternative Ending:

This alternate ending emphasizes the philosophical and ethical dilemmas faced by the characters. By engaging in a deep conversation, the story explores the nuances of justice, morality, and the consequences of one's actions. This ending maintains the suspense and tension of the original while adding a layer of introspection and complexity to the narrative. It also allows for a more ambiguous and thought-provoking conclusion that leaves readers contemplating the various shades of gray in the choices people make.

[tex]{\fcolorbox{black}{black}{\blue{जय\: श्री \:राम}}}[/tex]