Digital technologies can shift the traditional role of teacher and student both within and outside the classroom. Teachers can use digital technologies to connect people with each other and to new information, ideas, and perspectives. Students have access to mass information and many perspectives.
Explanation:
Texts regarding this pandemic’s consequences are appearing at an accelerating pace, with constant coverage by news outlets, as well as philosophical, historical, and sociological reflections by public intellectuals worldwide. Ripples from the current emergency have spread into the personal, social, and economic spheres. But are there continuities as well? Is the pandemic creating a “new normal” in education or simply accenting what has already become normal—an accelerating tendency toward technologization? This tendency presents an important challenge for education, requiring a critical vision of post-Covid-19 curriculum. One must pose an additional question: How can one resist the slide into passive technologization and seize the possibility of achieving a responsive, ethical, humane, and international-transformational approach to education?
Education both reflects what is now and anticipates what is next, recoding private and public responses to crises. Žižek (2020, p. 117) suggests in this regard that “values and beliefs should not be simply ignored: they play an important role and should be treated as a specific mode of assemblage”. As such, education is (post)human and has its (over)determination by beliefs and values, themselves encoded in technology.
Answers & Comments
Answer:
Digital technologies can shift the traditional role of teacher and student both within and outside the classroom. Teachers can use digital technologies to connect people with each other and to new information, ideas, and perspectives. Students have access to mass information and many perspectives.
Explanation:
HOPE IT HELPS.