This meaning is extensive enough to incorporate all kinds of art, but it doesn’t specifically cite how these embellishments must be experienced by a percipient. It let us know that there are numerous ways on how people could experience art. The definition is wide enough to avoid discrimination of natural art or environmental arts unlike the humanistic definition of what art is by Erwin Panofsky which states that art is a man-made object demanding to be experienced aesthetically. This definition limits the breadth of what to be experienced aesthetically, and imposes the rule that only man-made things should be given emphasis, meaning and be adored artistically. On the other hand, the definition of Melville Herskovits of what art is as stated above has the scope to include art works either made by human, by animals, or by nature.
Answers & Comments
Answer:
This meaning is extensive enough to incorporate all kinds of art, but it doesn’t specifically cite how these embellishments must be experienced by a percipient. It let us know that there are numerous ways on how people could experience art. The definition is wide enough to avoid discrimination of natural art or environmental arts unlike the humanistic definition of what art is by Erwin Panofsky which states that art is a man-made object demanding to be experienced aesthetically. This definition limits the breadth of what to be experienced aesthetically, and imposes the rule that only man-made things should be given emphasis, meaning and be adored artistically. On the other hand, the definition of Melville Herskovits of what art is as stated above has the scope to include art works either made by human, by animals, or by nature.