Answer:

1.Yes the have bias for or against the literature.

2.John Moir is strongly biased in favor of conservation efforts for the burrowing owl

at all costs. While Moir includes a diversity of information and perspectives, his

chosen facts are highly subjective, and skewed in favor of his opinion. By including

solely the perspective of conservationists, not developers or residents, Moir

shows just one viewpoint of the owls impact on humans. Furthermore, Moir’s

lack of conclusive scientific evidence further illustrates that he will argue for

increased regulation and conservation, regardless of other perspectives and facts

Explanation:

number two basis on my understanding