1. What is the importance of arrest in the administration of CJS?
2. What are the requisites for the issuance of a search warrant?
3. What is the general rule in effecting warrant of arrest? Explain
4. What is the exception to the general rule in executing warrant of arrest? Explain your answer and your basis. 5. What is the general rule in effecting Search and Seizure? What is the exception to the general rule? Explain your answer.
Answers & Comments
Answer:
1. What is the importance of arrest in the administration of CJS?
- The purpose of the criminal justice system should therefore not be just to arrest, prosecute and punish criminals. The system as a whole should have a greater purpose – to prevent crime and to create a peaceful, law-abiding society.
2. What are the requisites for the issuance of a search warrant?
- The warrant must describe the person, property or specific place to be searched and must describe the property to be seized.
3. What is the general rule in effecting warrant of arrest?
- The general rule is that to make an arrest, the police must obtain an arrest warrant. An arrest warrant is a warrant issued by a judge or magistrate on behalf of the state, which authorizes the arrest and detention of an individual, or the search and seizure of an individual's property.
4. What is the exception to the general rule in executing warrant of arrest?
- Other well-established exceptions to the warrant requirement include consensual searches, certain brief investigatory stops, searches incident to a valid arrest, and seizures of items in plain view.
5. What is the general rule in effecting Search and Seizure? What is the exception to the general rule? Explain your answer.
- Search and seizure is a procedure used in many civil law and common law legal systems by which police or other authorities and their agents, who, suspecting that a crime has been committed, commence a search of a person's property and confiscate any relevant evidence found in connection to the crime. When there is a declaration in the decision that the liability of the accused is only civil.
Hope it helps even though others are not that right :)