Explanation:

1.Mahmud was a great conqueror and he never faced any defeat in his 17 invasions of India. On the other hand, Ghori had to face a number of defeats. Not only this he lost his life at the hands of his enemy in India and did not reach his kingdom of Ghazni. Even in Central Asia, Mahmud was more successful and Ghori had to face defeat.

Mahmud did not try to establish his empire in India. He was more interested in plundering the wealth of India. Mahmud was more of a fanatic who wanted to spread Islam in India. He destroyed temples and idols of Hindu gods. His attacks were mostly directed on the religious places of the Hindus. Ghori on the other hand directed his attacks on important towns and forts.

Verified answer

Explanation:

1. The most basic difference between Mahmud of Ghazni and Muhammad Ghori was their purpose and intention for waging wars with Indian rulers.

- Mahmud of Ghazni (971-1030): Mahmud was the ruler of the Ghaznavid dynasty, which was centered in present-day Afghanistan. He conducted a series of invasions into the Indian subcontinent primarily to plunder its wealth and treasures. His main objective was to accumulate wealth and resources to strengthen his rule in Ghazni and promote the expansion of his empire. While he did defeat several Indian rulers and looted their cities, his conquests were primarily driven by economic gains.

- Muhammad Ghori (1149-1206): Muhammad Ghori was the founder of the Delhi Sultanate, an Afghan dynasty that established its stronghold in northern India. Unlike Mahmud of Ghazni, Ghori's objective was not merely plunder but rather the establishment of a political empire in the Indian subcontinent. His invasions were aimed at annexing territories and establishing his authority over the region. He defeated several Indian rulers, including Prithviraj Chauhan, in significant battles like the First Battle of Tarain (1191) and the Second Battle of Tarain (1192). Ghori's victories paved the way for the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate, which marked a significant period in Indian history under Islamic rule.

2. Statement: "Mahmud of Ghazni may have raided and destroyed parts of India; however, he also contributed to Persian culture."

While Mahmud of Ghazni is often remembered for his military campaigns and the looting of Indian cities, it is true that he also made contributions to Persian culture, especially through patronage of arts and scholarship.

Examples of his contributions to Persian culture:

a. Patronage of Scholars: Mahmud was a great patron of scholars, poets, and artists in his court. He supported and encouraged Persian intellectuals, which contributed to the flourishing of Persian literature and poetry during his reign. Some prominent poets like Ferdowsi, the renowned Persian poet who composed the Shahnameh (Book of Kings), found support from Mahmud.

b. Cultural Exchange: The constant interaction between the Persian-speaking regions and the Indian subcontinent during Mahmud's expeditions led to a cultural exchange. Persian culture, language, and ideas had an impact on the Indian cultural landscape, and vice versa.

c. Architectural Influence: Though his military campaigns often involved destruction, Mahmud also engaged in architectural endeavors. He built magnificent structures in Ghazni, blending elements of Persian and Central Asian architecture. These constructions added to the richness of Persian architectural heritage.

d. Literary Legacy: Mahmud's court became a center of learning, attracting scholars from different parts of the Muslim world. This intellectual environment contributed to the preservation and transmission of classical Persian texts.

It is important to acknowledge both the positive and negative aspects of historical figures like Mahmud of Ghazni. While he played a role in fostering Persian culture, it should not overshadow the devastation caused by his military campaigns in the Indian subcontinent.