Answer:

Bentham is a Utilitarian, thus, broadly speaking, judges the moral rightness or wrongness of an action by the outcome. From that perspective “good” laws will produce the greatest good (variously defined) for the greatest number of people. Since societies change, if the laws do not change with them, they may cease producing that desired greatest good. A monolithic and immutable Law would not be able to adapt, and, in fact we do change our laws as times change, thus Law cannot be considered as such.

Say what you want about the tenets of Utilitarianism, but at least it’s an ethos.

Answer:

1. Bentham considered only quantity of pleasure, but Mill considered both quantity and quality of pleasure.

2.Utilitarianism is one of the best known and most influential moral theories. Like other forms of consequentialism, its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. More specifically, the only effects of actions that are relevant are the good and bad results that they produce. A key point in this article concerns the distinction between individual actions and types of actions. Act utilitarians focus on the effects of individual actions (such as John Wilkes Booth’s assassination of Abraham Lincoln) while rule utilitarians focus on the effects of types of actions (such as killing or stealing).

Explanation:

#brainliest